Use of Laser
in Controlling the Growth of Facial Structures, "Laser-Orthopedics"
This was an endeavor to use a
laser to control the development of facial structures, especially the condyle and the mandible. The aim of the study was to
investigate the potential use of a laser for treating patients whose facial
structures are predisposed to deviation in growth and development
much as
chin-cups, face-masks and headgear are used. Laser treatment might, one day, be
an additional method for controlling the development of these facial
structures.
Three groups of three hamsters
were established:
The long term study over seven
months showed slower lower jaw growth in both Groups B and C, relative to group
A. The
importance of these findings is the implied possibility of laser use in the
future to modify the growth and development of facial structures in
humans.
In Vitro, Chin-cup, diode
laser, Laser-Orthodontic Therapy.
INTRODUCTION:
Orthodontics is one of the
important domains with interests in human growth and development.
Nine hamsters of the same age
were used in this study. They were divided into three groups
for comparison.
This force has been
demonstrated to be efficient in hindering or slowing the normal growth of the
lower jaw11.
In all nine animals, the
length of lower jaws were measured in monthly intervals to compare the
efficiency of each method on both groups "B" and "C".
The Influence of Laser on
growth
Unfortunately, the
contemporary usage of laser is still often "ablative".
To understand the normal
growth in facial structures, it's desirable to study the Condyle Cartilage strata.
The Condyle Cartilage strata
are:
According to chin-cup
studies12 the influence of chin-cup happens on the
aspect of Prechondroblasts
stratum.
However, the influence of low
laser energy laser is slightly different as it mainly happens on the so-called
zone of growth and zone of maturation, or in other words the prechondroblasts, cartilaginous matrix, hypertrophied chondroblasts, and the calcified cartilaginous
matrix.

The fibrous capsule, the prechondroblasts, and skeletoblasts form the so-called Zone of Growth.

Fig2. Strata
of the mandibular condyle.
RESULTS:
In this experiment, Group B,
where the chin-cup had been used for seven months, the greatest retardation in
mandibular growth was in the beginning of the experiment, with
the
highest percentage of delay in jaw growth in the first month (42%).
In contrast to Group B, Group
C (the three hamsters treated with low energy laser) had the most delay in
growth in the seventh month. The values of delay in growth had been minimal in
the first month (5)%, but, gradually , the growth was reduced to approximately
20% relative to Group A on the final days of the seventh month. (P<0.05)
Group C does not exhibit an
"onslaught" effect.
The advantage of the laser
technique in Group C was apparent in its ability to retard mandibular growth in
the hamster. Growth restriction increased continuously from 5% in the first
month to about 20% in the final steps of the
experiment.
TABLE
1. The Average of Changes of values of growth: "in
groups B and C" relatively to A per month. SD means here the Standard
deviation.
|
Months
|
Group
B "Chin-Cup"
AC
SD |
Group C "low
energy laser"
AC
SD | ||
|
1 |
42 |
0.084 |
5 |
0.011 |
|
2 |
25 |
0.069 |
7 |
0.013 |
|
3 |
22 |
0.047 |
9 |
0.014 |
|
4 |
25 |
0.036 |
13 |
0.012 |
|
5 |
20 |
0.026 |
15 |
0.016 |
|
6 |
13 |
0.061 |
17 |
0.025 |
|
7 |
8 |
0.064 |
20 |
0.022 |
DISCUSSION:
This experiment illustrates a
potential substitution to chin-cup therapy in the future.
Therefore, for laser to be used in
non-ablative therapies, it is paramount that acceptable thresholds be
established to allow its therapeutic use without the risk of destructive or
necrotic changes. The
mechanism of laser energy influence on the tissue strata is still somewhat
vague. It will be important to find the possible "receptors" or the tissues of
higher "response". If this could be established it would be of great value in
establishing a therapeutic laser technique.
Conclusion:
This experiment demonstrates
the use of the laser in regulating facial growth and its potential as a
substitute for current conventional methods such as a
chin-cup
References:
|
1. Ackerman JL: The Challenge of Adult
orthodontics, J Clin Orthal 2.Ackerman JL, Proffit
WR: Soft tissue limitation in
orthodontics diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod 67:327-336,1997. 3.Allardice JT, Abulafi AM, Grahn MF, Williams NS: Adjuvant intraoperative photodymanic
therapy for colorectal carcinoma: A clinical study. Surg Oncol 1994, 3:1-9.
4. American Association of Orthodontics: Study of
the availability of Orthodontic Services, AM J Orthod 68:326, 1975. 5.Arnocsky SP, Aksan A. Thermal
modification of connective tissue, Basic Science consideration and
clinical impressions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;
8:305-310. 6.De Vries N, Van der Waal I, Snow GB:
Multiple primary tumors in oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 15:85-87. 7.Dilkes MG, Mc Gillian JA. Adjunctive intraoperative photodynamic therapy and microvascular anastomoses.Arch Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg
1997; 123:888. 8.Drelich RC: A cephalometric study of untreated class II
division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 21:44-56,
1948. 9.Graber LW. Chin-cup therapy for
mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 72:23-41,
1977. 10. Graber LW. Psycho-social
implication of dentofacial appearance.
Doctoral Dissertation,
11. Graber TM: Extra-oral force facts-fallacies,
Am J Orthod 41:490-505,
1955. 12. Graber TM: Orthodontics, principles and
practices, 13.Graber TM: Personal
communication, 1975. 14. Graber TM: Extrinsic control factors
controlling facial growth, 1976, Center for Human Growth and
developments. Graber TM, Chung DD, Aoba JT: Dentofacial orthopedic versus orthodontics, Am Dent
Association 75:1145-1166, 1967. 15. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM,
Westernman GH,Blankenau RJ, Powell GL, Berg JH. Enamel caries
initiation and Progression following Low Energy Argon Laser.JClin Dent
1995;20(1):9-13 16.Jost-Brinkman PG, Stien H et al: Histological investigation of
the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal
and ceramic brackets. Am J
Orthod 102:410,1992 17. Kharsa M A. Comparison among Fixed and
Removable Appliances in Fulfilling Orthodontic
Movements. Doctoral Dissertation,
18. Kuhn RJ. Control of
extra-oral dimension and proper selection of extra-oral anchorage.
Angle Orthod 38:341,1986. 19.Luder HU, Effects of
activator treatment- Evidence of the occurrence of two different types of reaction, Eur, J Orthod 3:205,
1981. 20. Mc Namara JA Jr.
Neuro-muscular and skeletal adaptation to
altered orofacial function. Monograph 1, Craniofacial series, 21. Mc Namara JA Jr.
Neuro-muscular and skeletal adaptation to
altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod 64:578, 1973. 22. Wolgin M, Finkenberg J, Papaioannou T
et al, Excimer ablation of human intervertebral disc at 308 nanometers. Laser Surg Med 1989; 9:124-131. |
| Dr.
Mhd. Azhar Kharsa |
|
Dr
.Azhar Kharsa Tel/Facsimile: (+ 963
11) 2127375 |